A Review Of The North American Species Of The Fungus-gardening Ant Genus Trachymyrmex

• Research note
• Open Access
• Published: 24 March 2020

Development, characterization, and cross-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers for North American Trachymyrmex and Mycetomoellerius ants

BMC Research Notes volume 13, Article number:173 (2020) Cite this article

• 854 Accesses

• 2 Citations

• 2 Altmetric

• Metrics details

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to develop and identify polymorphic microsatellite markers for fungus-gardening (attine) ants in the genus Trachymyrmex sensu lato. These ants are important ecosystem engineers and have been a model group for understanding complex symbiotic systems, but very little is understood about the intraspecific genetic patterns across most North American attine species. These microsatellite markers will help to better study intraspecific population genetic structure, gene flow, mating habits, and phylogeographic patterns in these species and potentially other congeners.

Results

Using next-generation sequencing techniques, we identified 17 and 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers from T. septentrionalis and Mycetomoellerius (formerly Trachymyrmex) turrifex, respectively, and assessed the genetic diversity of each marker. We also analyzed the cross-amplification success of the T. septentrionalis markers in two other closely related Trachymyrmex species, and identified 10 and 12 polymorphic markers for T. arizonensis and T. pomonae, respectively.

Introduction

Fungus-gardening ants (tribe Attini) have been subject to decades of research elucidating their major evolutionary transitions and radiations [1,2,3,4,5]. Despite these revolutionary advances, most attine research has occurred at higher taxonomic levels (species or higher). Consequently, we know very little about the microevolutionary processes that may underlie macroevolutionary (phylogenetic) patterns. This lack of understanding is partially technical since most genetic markers used to construct phylogenies typically exhibit little intraspecific variation, for both the ants and fungi [2, 6,7,8]. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers, while useful for large scale geographic studies [9,10,11], may be generally problematic because some attines may have nuclear-incorporated mtDNA-like sequences or whose genomes contain pseudogenes [7, 12]. Moreover, mtDNA is maternally inherited, which may or may not be indicative of intraspecific patterns of gene flow since male and female ants are known to exhibit different patterns of gene flow [13,14,15]. Finer-level intraspecific examinations have typically required specific diploid markers such as microsatellites or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [16,17,18,19]. Both approaches represent co-dominant expression and genome-wide distributions, but microsatellites are short, non-coding, highly variable repetitive motifs [20], whereas SNPs are shorter and found throughout coding and non-coding genomic regions [21].

SNPs are popular in the genomics age because of the large quantities of potentially informative sites quickly generated in a single sequencing run, but they require considerable time and effort to identify and analyze, and are typically restricted to single studies. Conversely, microsatellite markers, once developed, can be used repeatedly in multiple studies, which may reduce their overall expense on a per-project basis [22]. Moreover, recent comparative studies in insects, fungi, and birds reported no major population genetic structural differences between these two approaches [23,24,25,26], or that more SNPs were required to produce the same information as a single microsatellite marker [27].

Traditional microsatellite development techniques (i.e., constructing libraries, cloning) have yielded polymorphic microsatellite markers for both higher and lower attines [28,29,30,31,32]. However, because these markers were developed for tropical attines, they may or may not be useful for North American species (J.N. Seal, unpublished observations), which tend to belong to phylogenetically distinct lineages [3, 33]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have revolutionized microsatellite marker development in terms of decreased time and cost, and increased quantity of potential markers [34,35,36], although only a few studies have utilized these techniques for attines. Extensive marker sets exist for Acromyrmex lundii [37], Atta laevigata [38], and two species in the lower attine genus Mycocepurus [18, 39].

Here, our aim was to use NGS techniques to develop microsatellite markers for two additional attine species, Trachymyrmex septentrionalis and Mycetomoellerius turrifex. Both are common and ecologically important fungus-gardening ants throughout southeastern North America [10, 40, 41]. We also explored the potential for cross-amplification of the T. septentrionalis markers in two closely related species: T. arizonensis and T. pomonae. These three species belong to Trachymyrmex sensu stricto, unlike M. turrifex which belongs to a new genus, Mycetomoellerius [3, 33, 42]. These markers will provide a new tool to study patterns of attine intraspecific genetic variation and phylogeographic structure.

Main text

Methods

Primer sets were developed from a single T. septentrionalis forager collected in north Florida ([10] Site C; 30.2796, − 84.9004) and a single M. turrifex forager collected in central Texas (University of Texas at Austin; 30.2861, − 97.7297). Illumina sequencing and primer design were conducted at the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (University of Georgia, USA) in the Molecular Ecology Laboratory. A Covaris S220 Focused-ultrasonicator sheared 1 μg of genomic DNA to prepare an Illumina paired-end shotgun library following standard Illumina TruSeq DNA Library Kit protocols and using a multiplex identifier adaptor index. Sequencing was conducted on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA) producing 100-bp paired-end reads. PAL_FINDER v.0.02.03 [43] was used to analyze five million resulting reads, and those with di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide microsatellites were extracted. Positive reads were batched to a local installation of Primer3 v.2.0.0 [44, 45] for primer design. Markers for which the primer sequence only occurred three or four times in the five million reads were selected to avoid duplication. From this selection of 9293 (T. septentrionalis) and 6943 (M. turrifex) markers, we chose a subset to test (46 for T. septentrionalis; 20 for M. turrifex) following an M13-tail PCR protocol [46].

We extracted genomic DNA from individual worker ants (from restricted portions of their respective ranges; Additional file 1) preserved in 95% ethanol at − 20 °C using a QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN). In particular, ants used in the development of T. septentrionalis markers were all collected in Florida (i.e., not Texas) (Table 1). For all species, the 10 μL PCR mix contained 1 μL of 10X PCR buffer (1.0X; Applied Biosystems), 1 μL Bioline^® dNTP mix (1 mM each; 0.1 mM proportional to total), 1.5 μL of 25 mM MgCl₂ (3.75 mM; Applied Biosystems), 0.5 μL of 20 μM BSA (1 μM; New England Biolabs), 0.3 μL of 2 μM tag-labeled primer (0.06 μM; forward primer with M13-tail), 0.6 μL of a 2 μM universal dye-labeled primer (0.12 μM; FAM label with M13-tail), 1 μL of 2 μM unlabeled primer (0.2 μM; reverse primer), 0.1 μL of Taq polymerase (0.5 U; Applied Biosystems), and 1 μL of DNA template. PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation of 4 min at 95 °C, 25 (or 30) cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at the primer-specific annealing temperature identified by a temperature gradient program, 45 s at 72 °C, then 8 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 53 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C, and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were run on an Applied Biosystems 3730 Genetic Analyzer and fragments were sized with LIZ600 size standard at the University of Texas at Austin DNA Sequencing Facility.

Table 1 Trachymyrmex septentrionalis polymorphic microsatellite markers analyzed for Trachymyrmex septentrionalis ants

Full size table

We scored alleles in Geneious v.10.2.3 [47]. For markers that resulted in high quality PCR product and exhibited polymorphism, we measured genetic variability for each species. We estimated the number of alleles per locus (K), observed and expected heterozygosity (H_o and H_e), and the probability of identity (PI; the probability of two independent samples having the same genotype) using GenAlEx v.6.5 [48, 49]. Sample sizes (numbers of individuals tested) for each marker are provided (Tables 1 and 2, Additional files 2 and 3). We assessed deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and tested for linkage disequilibrium (LD) across all pairs of markers using GENEPOP v.4.2 [50] employing Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. The presence of null alleles was assessed using Microchecker [51].

Table 2 Mycetomoellerius turrifex polymorphic microsatellite markers analyzed for Mycetomoellerius turrifex ants

Full size table

Results

For Trachymyrmex septentrionalis markers tested on T. septentrionalis ants, 37 of the original 46 positively amplified with 17 being reliably amplified and scored. The other 20 either showed weak amplification, weak polymorphism (2–4 alleles per marker), monomorphism, or multi-peak profiles. The number of alleles across all samples of the 17 reliable markers ranged from 9 to 33 (average = 16.2). H_o varied from 0.11 to 0.89 (average = 0.62), while H_e ranged from 0.65 to 0.94 (average = 0.84). After Bonferroni correction, 9 markers showed significant deviations from HWE. There were two cases of LD detected across the 136 paired markers (between Ts4 and Ts5, and Ts3 and Ts43; Table 1; Additional file 4). Most of the loci tested significantly for the presence of null alleles, which suggests that T. septentrionalis may have even higher allelic diversity than what we captured in our sampling (Table 1).

Of the 20 original Mycetomoellerius turrifex markers, 17 positively amplified with 12 reliably amplified and scored. The number of alleles across all samples ranged from 4 to 12 (average = 8.9). H_o varied from 0.2 to 0.71 (average = 0.49), while H_e ranged from 0.58 to 0.88 (average = 0.78). After Bonferroni correction, 6 markers showed significant deviations from HWE. There were no cases of LD detected across the 66 paired markers (Table 2; Additional file 4). In contrast to T. septentrionalis, the frequency of null alleles was lower in M. turrifex (Table 2).

We tested cross-species amplification of the 46 T. septentrionalis markers developed here in both T. arizonensis and T. pomonae. For T. arizonensis (n = 8), 24 markers were positively amplified with 10 reliably scored. Of those 10, all revealed at least 2 alleles, 8 revealed 3 or more alleles, and 9 exhibited some heterozygosity. There were 9 markers in HWE and one violated HWE (Ts38). There was no LD (Additional files 2, 4). For T. pomonae (n = 6), 23 markers were successfully amplified and 12 were reliably scored. Of those 12, all revealed at least 2 alleles, 8 revealed 3 or more alleles, and 10 exhibited some heterozygosity. There were 10 in HWE, one violated HWE (also Ts38), and one could not be computed (Ts7) because there was only one copy of the second allele. There was no LD (Additional files 3, 4). Only one of the loci in T. pomonae and only two in T. arizonensis appeared to have null alleles; this likely results from examining ants collected across a few hectares of pine oak forest (Southwest Research Station) (Additional files 2 and 3).

Discussion

These newly developed microsatellite markers provide a promising new tool for population genetic, mating, dispersal, and phylogeographic studies of Trachymyrmex septentrionalis and Mycetomoellerius turrifex populations across their ranges. Positive cross-species amplification also indicates that some of the T. septentrionalis markers appear to be conserved in at least two other congeneric species (T. arizonensis and T. pomonae). This indicates that future analyses for additional individuals across a wider geographic region may be informative for understanding similar questions for T. arizonensis and T. pomonae and perhaps other closely related Trachymyrmex. It also seems likely that the markers developed here for M. turrifex should cross amplify in closely related Mycetomoellerius species, such as the highly studied M. zeteki [42, 52, 53], among others.

While all markers across all four species showed polymorphism/allelic variation, several markers (particularly within T. septentrionalis) were hypervariable (over 20 alleles per locus; Table 1). These hypervariable markers, collectively with other polymorphic markers, may be informative for investigating intraspecific dynamics at an especially fine-scale (e.g., mating habits such as multiple-mating or multiple-queen hypotheses by comparing relatedness of individuals within colonies). Despite the extensive polymorphism illustrated by these markers, evidence of null alleles suggests that more alleles may be discovered. The frequency of null alleles may be more pronounced in populations that already demonstrate significant genetic structure [54].

The new markers developed here may also be used in conjunction with mtDNA to better understand dispersal, signatures of population expansion or contraction, and phylogeographic history. For example, male and female ants of several species may mediate gene flow differentially through sex-specific dispersal patterns [13, 14, 55,56,57], but this has yet been tested in Trachymyrmex or Mycetomoellerius ants. By employing marker systems with different modes of inheritance, we may be able to discern how ecological dispersal patterns influence ant genetic structure across populations.

In a phylogeographic context, the application of both maternally and biparentally inherited markers may also help to uncover and track the progression of previously unrecognized or poorly understood historical processes such as species origin, divergence, colonization, and genetic drift. For example, the extensive evidence for null alleles in T. septentrionalis is likely driven by phylogeographic structure in this species across the relatively restricted range examined in this study (northern Florida) [10]. We explored the 17 T. septentrionalis markers across a small subset (total n = 12) of T. septentrionalis ants from Texas as compared to a random subset of T. septentrionalis ants from Florida. The allelic diversity appears to be much higher in Florida than in Texas (see Additional file 5), which may suggest some fundamental genomic differences in populations east and west of the Mississippi River. These preliminary results align with previous mtDNA results that suggest (1) a significant divergence between populations on either side of the Mississippi River and (2) limited genetic diversity west of the Mississippi River [10, 11]. Future analyses comparing the allelic diversity of populations east and west of the Mississippi River would be insightful for better understanding these patterns.

Limitations

• The restricted sample size and geographic distribution for T. arizonensis and T. pomonae may underestimate potential polymorphic markers in these species.

• Markers not deviating from HWE in our initial screenings could potentially deviate in other populations, which may reduce the number of usable markers in certain genetic studies; on the other hand, markers deviating from HWE in the studied populations might not deviate in other populations, which would increase the number of markers.

• The presence of null alleles could be a result of potential phylogeographic structure in the populations studied (especially T. septentrionalis), as a result polymorphism may be underestimated.

• Sample sizes per marker for the Texas T. septentrionalis subset were smaller compared to Florida, which may limit our interpretations; however, reduced microsatellite diversity would be consistent with lower mtDNA diversity in western populations (Texas).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not presently public due to their use in ongoing publication, but the genotypic data for each sample are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

bp:

Base pair

H_e :

Expected heterozygosity

H_o :

Observed heterozygosity

HWE:

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

K:

Number of alleles

ld:

Linkage disequilibrium

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PI:

Probability of identity

SNPs:

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

T_m :

Annealing temperature

References

1. 1.

   Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The leafcutter ants. New York: W.W. Norton; 2011.

   Google Scholar

2. 2.

   Ješovnik A, Sosa-Calvo J, Lloyd MW, Branstetter MG, Fernández F, Schultz TR. Phylogenomic species delimitation and host-symbiont coevolution in the fungus-farming ant genus Sericomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): ultraconserved elements (UCEs) resolve a recent radiation. Syst Entomol. 2017;42(3):523–42.

   Article  Google Scholar

3. 3.

   Schultz TR, Brady SG. Major evolutionary transitions in ant agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(14):5435–40.

   CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

4. 4.

   Schultz TR, Sosa-Calvo J, Brady SG, Lopes CT, Mueller UG, Bacci M Jr, Vasconcelos HL. The most relictual fungus-farming ant species cultivates the most recently evolved and highly domesticated fungal symbiont species. Am Nat. 2015;185(5):693–703.

   PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

5. 5.

   Sosa-Calvo J, Schultz TR, Brandão CRF, Klingenberg C, Feitosa RM, Rabeling C, Bacci M Jr, Lopes CT, Vasconcelos HL. Cyatta abscondita: taxonomy, evolution, and natural history of a new fungus-farming ant genus from Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e80498.

   PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar

6. 6.

   Luiso J, Kellner K, Matthews AE, Mueller UG, Seal JN. High diversity and multiple invasions to North America by fungi grown by the northern most Trachymyrmex and Mycetomoellerius ant species. Fungal Ecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2019.100878.

   Article  Google Scholar

7. 7.

   Moreau CS. Inferring ant evolution in the age of molecular data (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News. 2009;12:201–10.

   Google Scholar

8. 8.

   Seal JN, Kellner K, Trindl A, Heinze J. Phylogeography of the parthenogenic ant, Platythyrea punctata: highly successful colonization of the West Indies by a poor disperser. J Biogeogr. 2011;38:868–82.

   Article  Google Scholar

9. 9.

   Cardoso DC, Cristiano MP, Tavares MG, Schubart CD, Heinze J. Phylogeography of the sand dune ant Mycetophylax simplex along the Brazilian Atlantic Forest coast: remarkably low mtDNA diversity and shallow population structure. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15(1):106.

   PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

10. 10.

    Seal JN, Thiebaud J, Mueller UG. Gone to Texas: comparative phylogeography of two Trachymyrmex species along the southeastern coastal plain of North America. Biol J Lin Soc. 2015;114(3):689–98.

    Article  Google Scholar

11. 11.

    Mikheyev AS, Vo TL, Mueller UG. Phylogeography of post-Pleistocene population expansion in a fungus-gardening ant and its microbial mutualists. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(20):4480–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

12. 12.

    Martins J, Solomon S, Mikheyev A, Mueller U, Ortiz A, Bacci M. Nuclear mitochondrial-like sequences in ants: evidence from Atta cephalotes (Formicidae: Attini). Insect Mol Biol. 2007;16(6):777–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

13. 13.

    Sanllorente O, Ruano F, Tinaut A. Large-scale population genetics of the mountain ant Proformica longiseta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Popul Ecol. 2015;57(4):637–48.

    Article  Google Scholar

14. 14.

    Johansson H, Seppä P, Helanterä H, Trontti K, Sundström L. Weak population structure in the ant Formica fusca. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5024–e5024.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

15. 15.

    Doums C, Cabrera H, Peeters C. Population genetic structure and male-biased dispersal in the queenless ant Diacamma cyaneiventre. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:2251–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

16. 16.

    Smith CC, Weber JN, Mikheyev AS, Roces F, Bollazzi M, Kellner K, Seal J, Mueller UG. Landscape genomics of an obligate mutualism: concordant and discordant population structures between the leafcutter-ant Atta texana and its two main fungal symbiont types. Mol Ecol. 2019;28(11):2831–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

17. 17.

    Kellner K, Fernández-Marín H, Ishak HD, Sen R, Linksvayer TA, Mueller UG. Co-evolutionary patterns and diversification of ant-fungus associations in the asexual fungus-farming ant Mycocepurus smithii in Panama. J Evol Biol. 2013;26(6):1353–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

18. 18.

    Rabeling C, Gonzales O, Schultz T, Bacci M, Garcia M, Verhaagh M, Ishak H, Mueller U. Cryptic sexual populations account for genetic diversity and ecological success in a widely distributed, asexual fungus-growing ant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(30):12366–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

19. 19.

    Kellner K, Seal J, Heinze J. Sex at the margins: geographic parthenogenesis in the ant Platythyrea punctata. J Evol Biol. 2013;26(1):108–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

20. 20.

    Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(6):435–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

21. 21.

    Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19(4):208–16.

    Article  Google Scholar

22. 22.

    Puckett EE. Variability in total project and per sample genotyping costs under varying study designs including with microsatellites or SNPs to answer conservation genetic questions. Conserv Genet Resour. 2017;9(2):289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar

23. 23.

    Tsykun T, Rellstab C, Dutech C, Sipos G, Prospero S. Comparative assessment of SSR and SNP markers for inferring the population genetic structure of the common fungus Armillaria cepistipes. Heredity. 2017;119:371.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

24. 24.

    Kaiser SA, Taylor SA, Chen N, Sillett TS, Bondra ER, Webster MS. A comparative assessment of SNP and microsatellite markers for assigning parentage in a socially monogamous bird. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017;17(2):183–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

25. 25.

    Coates BS, Sumerford DV, Miller NJ, Kim KS, Sappington TW, Siegfried BD, Lewis LC. Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis. J Hered. 2009;100(5):556–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

26. 26.

    Weinman LR, Solomon JW, Rubenstein DR. A comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for analysis of parentage and kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15(3):502–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

27. 27.

    Fernández ME, Goszczynski DE, Lirón JP, Villegas-Castagnasso EE, Carino MH, Ripoli MV, Rogberg-Muñoz A, Posik DM, Peral-García P, Giovambattista G. Comparison of the effectiveness of microsatellites and SNP panels for genetic identification, traceability and assessment of parentage in an inbred Angus herd. Genet Mol Biol. 2013;36(2):185–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

28. 28.

    Fjerdingstad E, Boomsma JJ, Thorén P. Multiple paternity in the leafcutter ant Atta colomhica:a microsatellite DNA study. Heredity. 1998;80:118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar

29. 29.

    Fjerdingstad EJ, Boomsma JJ. Queen mating frequency and relatedness in young Atta sexdens colonies. Insectes Soc. 2000;47:354–6.

    Article  Google Scholar

30. 30.

    Villesen P, Gertsch PJ, Boomsma JJ. Microsatellite primers for fungus-growing ants. Mol Ecol Notes. 2002;2(3):320–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar

31. 31.

    Ortius-Lechner D, Gertsch PJ, Boomsma JJ. Variable microsatellite loci for the leafcutter ant Acromyrmex echinatior and their applicability to related species. Mol Ecol. 2000;9(1):114–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

32. 32.

    Villesen P, Gertsch PJ, Frydenberg J, Mueller UG, Boomsma JJ. Evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in fungus-growing ants. Mol Ecol. 1999;8(11):1819–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

33. 33.

    Rabeling C, Cover SP, Johnson RA, Mueller UG. A review of the North American species of the fungus-gardening ant genus Trachymyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa. 2007;1664:1–53.

    Google Scholar

34. 34.

    Abdelkrim J, Robertson B, Stanton JA, Gemmell N. Fast, cost-effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. Biotechniques. 2009;46(3):185–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

35. 35.

    Castoe TA, Poole AW, Gu W, Jason de Koning AP, Daza JM, Smith EN, Pollock DD. Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(2):341–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

36. 36.

    Hudson ME. Sequencing breakthroughs for genomic ecology and evolutionary biology. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8(1):3–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

37. 37.

    Rabeling C, Bollazzi M, Bacci M, Beasley RR, Lance SL, Jones KL, Pierce NE. Development and characterization of twenty-two polymorphic microsatellite markers for the leafcutter ant, Acromyrmex lundii, utilizing Illumina sequencing. Conserv Genet Resour. 2013;6(2):319–22.

    Article  Google Scholar

38. 38.

    Kakazu S, Sanches A, Bacci M. Microsatellite loci characterized in the leaf-cutter ant Atta laevigata. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6(1):328.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar

39. 39.

    Rabeling C, Love C, Lance S, Jones K, Pierce N, Bacci M Jr. Development of twenty-one polymorphic microsatellite markers for the fungus-growing ant, Mycocepurus goeldii (Formicidae: Attini), using Illumina paired-end genomic sequencing. Conserv Genet Resour. 2014;6(3):739–41.

    Article  Google Scholar

40. 40.

    Tschinkel WR, Seal JN. Bioturbation by the fungus-gardening ant, Trachymyrmex septentrionalis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0158920.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar

41. 41.

    Seal JN, Tschinkel WR. Distribution of the fungus-gardening ant, Trachymyrmex septentrionalis during and after a record drought. Insect Conserv Divers. 2010;3:134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar

42. 42.

    Solomon SE, Rabeling C, Sosa-Calvo J, Lopes CT, Rodrigues A, Vasconcelos HL, Bacci M, Mueller UG, Schultz TR. The molecular phylogenetics of Trachymyrmex Forel ants and their fungal cultivars provide insights into the origin and coevolutionary history of 'higher-attine' ant agriculture. Syst Entomol. 2019;44(4):939–56.

    Article  Google Scholar

43. 43.

    Castoe TA, Poole AW, de Koning APJ, Jones KL, Tomback DF, Oyler-McCance SJ, Fike JA, Lance SL, Streicher JW, Smith EN, et al. Rapid microsatellite identification from illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30953.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

44. 44.

    Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1289–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

45. 45.

    Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

46. 46.

    Schuelke M. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(2):233–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

47. 47.

    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(2):1647–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

48. 48.

    Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–95.

    Article  Google Scholar

49. 49.

    Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research–an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

50. 50.

    Rousset F. genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8(1):103–6.

    Article  Google Scholar

51. 51.

    Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4(3):535–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

52. 52.

    De Fine Licht HH, Boomsma JJ. Variable interaction specificity and symbiont performance in Panamanian Trachymyrmex and Sericomyrmex fungus-growing ants. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14(1):244.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar

53. 53.

    Fernandez-Marin H. Dynamic disease management in Trachymyrmex fungus-growing ants (Attini: Formicidae). Am Nat. 2013;181(4):571–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

54. 54.

    Chapuis M-P, Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;24(3):621–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar

55. 55.

    Barth MB, Moritz RFA, Pirk CWW, Kraus FB. Male-biased dispersal promotes large scale gene flow in a subterranean army ant, Dorylus (Typhlopone) fulvus. Popul Ecol. 2013;55(4):523–33.

    Article  Google Scholar

56. 56.

    Sanetra M, Crozier RH. Patterns of population subdivision and gene flow in the ant Nothomyrmecia macrops reflected in microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol. 2003;12(9):2281–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

57. 57.

    Doums C, Cabrera H, Peeters C. Population genetic structure and male-biased dispersal in the queenless ant Diacamma cyaneiventre. Mol Ecol. 2002;11(11):2251–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Larry Gilbert, Steven Gibson and Rob Plowes facilitated collections at the University of Texas at Austin Stengl Biological Station and Brackenridge Field Laboratory. Joshua King and Andrea Lucky provided T. septentrionalis specimens from the Orlando and Gainesville, Florida areas, respectively. We thank Geoff Bender, Michele Lanan and Southwestern Research Station staff for providing logistical support and facilitating collection permits in the Coronado National Forest. This is paper No. 3 of the Ant Symbiosis Laboratory.

Funding

The work was supported primarily by a National Science Foundation CAREER award to JNS (IOS-152822) and DEB-1354629 to KK. Additional funding was provided by the UT Tyler Office of Sponsored Research to JNS and Texas Ecolab (www.texasecolab.org), who also provided access to private properties.

Author information

Affiliations

1. Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA

   Alix E. Matthews, Chase Rowan, Colby Stone, Katrin Kellner & Jon N. Seal

Contributions

JNS and KK conceived the study, secured funding and permits, and collected samples. AEM, CR, and CS performed DNA extractions, PCR work, and tested/optimized primer pairs on all species. AEM scored alleles and conducted data analysis. AEM and JNS led manuscript writing, and all authors edited the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon N. Seal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. The current research did not involve human subjects, human material, or human data or animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

List of individual ant samples used in this study. The table includes individual sample name, host species, state of collection, general sampling location, and coordinates of collection location (unless the property was under private ownership).

Additional file 2.

Details of the 10 Trachymyrmex septentrionalis polymorphic microsatellite markers analyzed for cross-amplification in Trachymyrmex arizonensis.

Additional file 3.

Details of the 12 Trachymyrmex septentrionalis polymorphic microsatellite markers analyzed for cross-amplification in Trachymyrmex pomonae.

Additional file 4.

Pairwise comparison results of the linkage disequilibrium analyses for all four species.

Additional file 5.

Details of the 17 Trachymyrmex septentrionalis polymorphic microsatellite markers analyzed for Trachymyrmex septentrionalis ants across Texas (TX) and Florida (FL), highlighting the differences between two distant populations. Details include: marker name, size range of observed alleles given in base pairs (bp), number of individuals genotyped (N), number of alleles observed (K).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, A.E., Rowan, C., Stone, C. et al. Development, characterization, and cross-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers for North American Trachymyrmex and Mycetomoellerius ants. BMC Res Notes 13, 173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05015-3

Download citation

• Received: 21 January 2020

• Accepted: 11 March 2020

• Published: 24 March 2020

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05015-3

Keywords

• Attini
• Fungus-gardening ant
• Intraspecific genetic diversity
• Microsatellites
• Population genetics

A Review Of The North American Species Of The Fungus-gardening Ant Genus Trachymyrmex

Source: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-020-05015-3

Posted by: hendersonburses.blogspot.com

Share this post